| More 
photographs, drawings, and sketches here High 
Resolution Downloads for Publicationask 
CM French for permission before printing
 History: 
  In 
1996, the National Park Service officials announced their intention 
to demolish Neutra and Alexander's 1961 modernist Cyclorama Building 
at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, a premiere first generation "visitor 
center" and a stunning example of a master architect's late-life 
aspirations. Despite its recent listing on the National Register of 
Historic Places for its ""its exceptional historic and architectural 
significance," the long-neglected building stands in the way of 
National Park Service plans to "restore" the battlefield landscape 
and move visitor facilities into a new interpretive center designed 
in a "more appropriate" architectural style. 
 The Gettysburg project posed considerable challenges for architect Richard 
Neutra. Commissioned as a flagship building for the National Park Service's 
"Mission 66" program -- a nationwide, billion-dollar program 
to modernize the U.S. parks -- the new visitor center had to house a 
massive 1883 panoramic painting depicting the battle of Gettysburg and 
occupy one of the most famous sites in American history. Neutra created 
a drum-shaped concrete rotunda to house the 40-foot high circular canvas; 
a glass, concrete, and stone wing accommodates ranger's offices and 
information services. Park officials insisted that the building be constructed 
on a prominent site overlooking the field where Pickett made his famous 
charge during the pivotal 1883 battle - the same spot
  depicted 
in the painting's brilliant scenography and a location deemed most convenient 
for the multitudes expected to visit the building during the 100th anniversary 
of the Civil War.
  At its opening 
The New York Times predicted that this "handsome new $1,000,000 
Park Visitor Center" would "become one of the showplaces of 
the National Park System." The Washington Post praised the "quietly 
monumental but entirely unsentimental" Neutra design, citing the 
Cyclorama Center as one of a set of "exceptionally distinguished 
and fearlessly modern" buildings in the national parks, each deserving 
of an architectural excellence award. In 1970, the American Institute 
of Architects agreed, honoring Mission 66 and the Park Service for the 
innovative development of modern facilities "in harmony with the 
architectural theme" of each park. 
 
  Gettysburg 
today is viewed as hallowed ground, a nationalist shrine to both victor 
and vanquished, Lincoln's triumphant "Union" and Jefferson 
Davis's valiant "Lost Cause." But Neutra rightly interpreted 
the battlefield legacy in a much larger sense, one that uniquely applied 
Lincoln's vision to a contemporary international political context. 
The U.S. Civil War Centennial Commission, created in 1957, set the tone 
when they emphasized that the upcoming anniversary celebrations be devoted 
to "keeping peace through international understanding." Neutra 
incorporated this message wholeheartedly in the Cyclorama Building --one 
of his last major public commissions. In his hands, the visitor center 
became a place of "cultural interchange" rather than a mere 
tourist trap. Crowds of up to 30,000 people could be accommodated outside 
the building which opened up to reveal an elevated "Rostrum of 
the Prophetic Voice." The visionary architect imagined that a procession 
of "great statesmen of the Nations
may be even a 'Cold War' 
enemy nation" such as India's Jawaharlal Nehru or China's Chou 
En-Lai, would present stirring speeches promoting global unanimity at 
the yearly anniversary of the Gettysburg Address. Where Lincoln spoke 
poignantly of the shattered Union between northern and southern states, 
Neutra dedicated his latter-day Lincoln Memorial to the cause of international 
harmony in a world threatened with atomic annihilation and a nation 
consumed with internal issues of civil rights. 
 Although Neutra's memorial concept resonated with America's international 
ambitions at mid century, changing social and
  political 
environments quickly rendered its utopian message ineffective. Today 
the Park Service maintains that the building must be removed from the 
battlefield. Yet Neutra's intentions for the structure and his humanistic 
theories behind its development -for years suppressed and unexplored 
-- are just beginning to be understood in the context of his period 
and ours. 
 In November, 2000, 
the National Parks Advisory Board refused to grant National Historic 
Landmark status to the Cyclorama Building, but approved the nominations 
for three other Mission 66-era visitor centers with identical historic 
contexts and statements of significance: Dinosaur, 
Utah; Wright Brothers, North Carolina; 
and Rocky Mountain, Colorado. Politics?   A renewed effort 
to save the building is underway, led by the Recent Past Preservation 
Network in cooperation with the Neutra Institute of Survival Through 
Design, DOCOMOMO, and other allied organizations. This coalition of 
preservationists is calling upon key public officials, including Pennsylvania 
Gov. Edward Rendell, to "pardon" the building and provide 
funds for its restoration. Only public support can save this building 
now. Sign on here to save the Cyclorama! [by Christine Madrid 
French for the DOCOMOMO U.S. 
newsletter; photographs ©Boris 
Starosta] 
 
|  | See 
also select measured drawings of the building, recently completed by the Historic American Buildings Survey
 on our HABS Drawings page
 featuring downloadable PDFs of each image.
 |  Other sites with 
images: Photo 
Gallery of Images on the Richard and Dion Neutra Architecture site. 
  Other Documents: Landscape 
Preservation and Interpretation: Issues of Use, Historical Experience, 
and Myth at Gettysburg National Military Park. Thesis by Nathan 
Jefferson Riddle (Columbia University, 1998). Critical analysis of National 
Park Service interpretive policies at Gettysburg NMP with special coverage 
of Neutra's Cyclorama Building (ca. 1961) and its place on the battlefield 
of Gettysburg. 
 
| "The Gettysburg 
park staff tendentiously approached writing the DOE with the intention 
of portraying the building�s mechanical and maintenance problems 
as inherent design flaws. The motive of the park service was to 
portray the building as a lesser, pitiful example of Neutra�s work, 
designed when he was in poor health and at the end of his partnership 
with Robert Alexander. Based upon an anti-modern conceit of the 
park Superintendent, the analysis is slanted and misleading. Latschar�s 
intentions and the arguments used to support his proposals pose 
dangers more general than to just Neutra�s building. The National 
Park Service acts as a preservation mentor for the nation, and in 
this regard, if the argument becomes accepted that the technical 
failings of a structure render that work of negligible significance, 
then the country would lose many cherished architectural icons." 
Read more... |    
 |