Sunday, January 3, 2010

Raleigh's little-known connection to Make It Right

While Cherokee’s history is fairly well-known in Raleigh, (primarily in development circles), the firm’s connection to the nationally recognized Make it Right foundation is not.

I recently had the good fortune to tour the offices of Cherokee on 111 East Hargett Street in downtown Raleigh. The opportunity arose through a personal contact, who, until the recent economic downturn, had been heavily involved with Cherokee’s non-profit arm, Cherokee Gives Back. It began with a simple conversation several months ago when my friend became pleasantly surprised by my interest in Cherokee and their brownfield redevelopment efforts. I had come to know Cherokee while studying urban planning several years ago, when the firm was being touted by a professor as one of the “good guys” in the development world. (I continue to hold the same opinion after coming to know the firm at a much more intimate level.)

A brief pause in the story to give a history of Cherokee and it’s development to become a cutting-edge, sustainable development firm. From Cherokee’s website:

In 1984, a group of investors including Tom Darden purchased four brick plants and merged them to form Cherokee Sanford Group (CSG), which grew to become the largest privately held brick manufacturer in North America. When we discovered petroleum-contaminated soil at one of the plant sites, the regulators suggested taking the impaired soil to a nearby landfill. As an alternative, CSG proposed mixing it with clean clay in the brick-making process. The combustion in the kilns burned up the fuel oil in the soil. From this beginning, CSG started a business of receiving contaminated clay from underground storage tank clean-ups. By 1990, CSG was the largest soil remediator in the mid-Atlantic region, eventually cleaning up nearly 15 million tons of contaminated material.

Tom Darden and John Mazzarino formed the predecessor company of Cherokee in 1993 to focus exclusively on environmentally impaired assets. In 1994 they organized a risk management advisory affiliate and then formed Cherokee's first institutional capital (Fund I) in 1996. Cherokee formed a $250 million private equity fund (Fund II) in 1998, a $620 million fund (Fund III) in 2002, and its current, $1.2 billion fund (Fund IV) in 2005.

Elsewhere on the firm’s website it states that the capital has now grown to nearly $2 billion under management in Fund IV. Make no mistake that Cherokee is in business to make a profit for their investors, but unlike many other developers, they are seeking to achieve that goal by developing sustainable properties, often on formerly contaminated soil.

Initial discussions with my friend gave way, to more serious, sit-down discussions about his previous role with Cherokee. Eventually he loaned me the book Architecture in Times of Need – Make It Right Rebuilding New Orleans Lower Ninth Ward. I read the entire book that day and learned that my friend, Samuel Whitt, was involved with Cherokee Gives Back such that he is currently the only board member of the Make It Right Foundation, although he later told me that they have one board member confirmed to soon join and several others in various stages of discussions.

After one of our discussions, Sam took me on a tour of Cherokee’s Offices in downtown Raleigh, where I met John Mazzarino and Tom Darden, both of whom were friendly and engaging. The real reason for the office visit was to show me Cherokees offices, where they retrofit (in conjunction with property owner Empire Hardhat), a 100 year old furniture store into one of the few Leed Platinum renovation projects in the US. The AIA wrote a fantastically detailed article about the renovation if you follow the link, so there is no need for me to go into detail, but please take a look. The project is very interesting and highlights many of the challenges posed when trying to upfit an old structure into a “green” office building.

Finally, the connection between Cherokee Gives Back and Make It Right goes all the way to the beginnings of MIR. I don’t know all the details, (although they can be found in the book which I referenced earlier), but my understanding is that sometime between late 2006 and early 2007, Tom Darden (CEO Cherokee), Samuel Whitt, William McDonough and others met with Brad Pitt to discuss his ideas to help out the residents of the Lower Ninth Ward in New Orleans. This was in response to Pitt’s widely publicized criticisms of the Federal Government’s slow response to help the residents of New Orleans. More detailed information about the mission and history of MIR can be at Make It Right.org.

Personal opinions vary widely on the success of the Make It Right Foundation. However, when many were sitting on their hands, they came in, and through donations, have almost met the original goal of 150 houses and continue to make home ownership (specifically for residents returning to rebuild in the Lower Ninth Ward) a viable option. I recognize that many of the houses are non-traditional, some seem too theoretical or idealistic, but in the end they will be safer, healthier (and hopefully) more affordable houses for the families living in them. More information about the goals for the houses and the homeowner process can again be found on MIR’s website.

This article was not so much about determining the values and successes of the Make It Right Foundation, so much as it was intended to publicize the crucial role that a local firm, Cherokee, played in helping get MIR up and running. Cherokee, through Cherokee Gives Back provided the manhours and expertise to get the ball rolling, by working with Brad Pitt and William McDonough + Partners among many others, including many New Orleans residents. Cherokee also provided the critical institutional infrastructure when the foundation was formed, donations began to roll in and administrative functions were needed. Very quietly, and from hundreds of miles away, a Raleigh firm played a big role in getting what has become a very nationally recognized foundation off the ground. And that’s just one aspect of what Cherokee Gives Back has been busy doing over the past few years.

Friday, December 18, 2009

Thoughts about another view of Raleigh's skyline

Several months ago (it's been far too long since we paid the blog the attention it deserves) we wrote about some of the best views of Raleigh's skyline, including views from the Boylan Bridge and from McDowell Street. While they are very different views, each offer insights into the past, as well as the future, of the City of Oaks.

I recently discovered another view, from the 9th floor of the DH Hill library on NCSU's campus. It provides an interesting perspective on the discussion. The first thing evident in this view, is the linear, north-south orientation of Raleigh's downtown. The north end is comprised primarily of government buildings (City, County and State), while the south end is more business interests, as well as some residential. Also quickly evident is the overall flat terrain, with some rolling hills so common to the Piedmont region.



On the surface the image seems somewhat banal, with little information about Raleigh to share. For some reason, however the image kept returning to my mind. It felt like there was something there to discover, something to inform my understanding of the city. Going back to the image later in the day, my thoughts became somewhat more clear. Raleigh is not a city that was selected for its proximity to some predominant natural feature, such as a river or mountain. Nor is it a city that one thinks about as highly urbanized or dense. Yet in this image it appears to have a fairly urban core, with little visual evidence of urban sprawl.

The natural feature most prominent in Raleigh (clearly displayed in this image), is its densely-wooded nature, and subsequent tree canopy. The large population of Oak trees (for which the city receives its nickname, the City of Oaks), as well as other native species, provide a thick canopy over much of the city. This is true even in December, when most of the deciduous trees have shed their leaves. The canopy is so thick that it covers much of the lower density areas that prevail in Raleigh.

A trip up to the library wasn't necessary to glean this seemingly small observation, but maybe it caused me to think a little longer about the region as a whole (and the underlying disconnect between the various cities) than I otherwise would have. I began to think that maybe in this instance the lesson to be learned is less about what I do see, and more about what I don't see.

In the visually-biased and visually-dominated society that we live in, it makes sense to consider the role that visual connections play in our sense of belonging, especially to a particular area such as the triangle. For example, when entering the woods, one only needs to walk a short distance before a feeling of seclusion and isolation ensues, despite the short distance traveled. Maybe this lack of visual reciprocity is one small part of the explanation to why Raleigh struggles to claim its role as the capital city within the triangle, not to mention throughout the state. Or why people living outside the beltline describe going "downtown" like an all day event to some distant, foreign destination. Or why the region as a whole is often described as the triangle and rarely as the Raleigh metro area. Maybe this tells us something about how crucial the role of sight is in design of all sorts. Or, maybe it tells us nothing at all.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Raleigh being Raleigh...

While I commend the City of Raleigh for holding the Moore Square re-design competition I have a hard time grasping exactly how the jury decided upon the winning submission. Recently I’ve spent quite a bit of time looking more in depth at many of the entrants and I have to wonder, am I missing something? I quite like the 3rd place entry by Stephen Stimson Associates (Falmouth, MA) as well as a number of the honorable mentions, specifically those done by Davin Hong, Tonic Design, and Lappas & Havener + Frank Harmon Architects and I fail to see how ANY of those could place behind what for all intents and purposes is a scheme that revolves around a manufactured "hill" along with extraordinarily cheap-looking playground equipment as two of it's primary design features. The images may have been "pretty" in the sense that they were well done technically, but the scheme overall feels like a space that could quite literally be ANYWHERE, USA. In addition, there's nothing remotely specific to the city of Raleigh or the surrounding site context within the scheme. All that was included in any of the renderings/plans was the square itself, with absolutely no mention, reference, or image reflecting the overall site. How could this happen? It must be said that while I personally know and highly respect more than a few members of the Jury, I find my faith in design, community design specifically, seriously shaken by this entire process. This competition was a golden opportunity for something extraordinary, not only for the City of Raleigh but for all of North Carolina as well. What we got could not have possibly been less exciting and I’m more than a little embarrassed for it. All in all, I guess its just business as usual and Raleigh just being Raleigh....




Friday, October 30, 2009

Monica Ponce de Leon lecture NEXT Monday (7PM, Nov 9)

Next Monday night (Nov 9) there will be a fantastic, open to the public, lecture at NCSU's Burns Auditorium at 7 pm. Monica Ponce De Leon will be speaking about her work with Office DA (as co-founder and principal) and possibly some of her efforts as the new dean at the Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Design at the University of Michigan. Office DA does great work and we've heard that her lectures are not to be missed. Be there early if you want to get a good seat, it should be packed.

Monday, October 12, 2009

We're Back!!!! Our Moore Square Competition Entry

Below are the images from the North Carolina Design CoOperative (NCDC) Moore Square entry. Although we got a good response, we unfortunately did not place. Everything's being kept pretty under wraps about the winners but it has come to our attention that both Kling Stubbins and Tonic Design (along with David Hill) received Honorable Mentions, congratulations to those guys. We'll have more on the competition/process later.
















Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Blog Status Update

For the past month or so Raleigh AAU has had to be set aside due to a variety of reasons. We will be finishing up our Moore Square entry this week and we hope to be back to the blog full force come October. After submissions are closed and the reviews take place we will be posting our entry to the blog as well as a lengthy article on the entire process. Also in the works is an article on the Szostak Design "New American House" project, which located in Raleigh and set to break ground within the next few months. We are very sorry for the lack of recent activity but we're excited about the future. See you soon....

Monday, September 7, 2009

N & O Home of the Month

The News and Observer's August edition of the "Home of the Month" was just recently released. The "Home of the Month" is a collaborative initiative between N & O, and NCSU's College of Design, specifically through the Home Environments Design Initiative (HEDI). This month's article is written by current NCSU graduate student Virginia Alexander.

Transplanted Glory